Decide How Many Times This Jury Was Tainted -- Corrupt Trials Judges 20th Century -- Reed Elsevier Criminal Enterprise

Keep our heroes alive by LIVING, DOING more! Remember 911day.

The Members Trial Transcript Managing Directors! Best & Brightest Total News Suppression

h1 align=center title="Book of Succeeding Well and Road For Health Support Header One">How Tainted Was This Jury? In a courtroom with a federal judge, a dozen federal attorneys, a group of defendant, and spectators, a nervous juror entered the courtroom, separated from the other jurors, and had the courage to tell the Court that people were using improper influence in the jury room. The Court snapped at this literally shaking woman.

With uncommon bravado, she insisted that people were making decisions for other people. Again, the Court's voice rose, saying, "Ah! Ah! I don't want to hear it!" and sent her back into the jury room for deliberations. One might think the attorneys would be leaping, hm?
Not a peep.

At one point during this genuinely inexplicable trial, another juror notified the Court that her Mercedes Benz had been hit and damaged in the courthouse parking lot, and that she was sure the hit and run had been committed by one of the defendants, Annette Haley, with Haley's Mercedes Benz. Never mind that Haley had numerous outside investments; none of the other defendants except the publisher of Who's Who had ever owned a Mercedes. Yet the impression on the jury was clearly significant, more so with a juror carping in every private jury session that a rich defendant's Mercedes had hit and damaged her car, AND had denied it and "Who's going to pay for it?," and.... ... and this does not bode well.

After a few days of complaints, and notes to the Court about who she should submit her money claim to, that juror was finally released, long after her damage was done.

Is it probable, possible, or in any way reasonable for employees of a complainant to sit on the jury? The use of the plural is both intended and accurate: although the U.S. Postal Service was the de jure complainant in this case, efforts to secure jury seats for postal employees succeeded, with nary a peep from the federally-paid defense attorneys. With a sixteen-week trial, and enormous pressure from above, it is clear what their influence effected.

The jury heard days and days and more days of testimony about Bruce Gordon's egregiously lavish lifestyle and ninety-dollar socks; followed by weeks and more weeks of testimony about his financial and ethical chicanery. Talk about poisoning people with guilt by association! Not one of the defendants earned in a year what Gordon spent in a week, never spent personal time with him nor broke bread with him, yet the jury concluded that if Gordon could live this way, his employees must have been doing the same thing. Hundreds of hours of testimony focused exclusively on Gordon and his financial picture.

When several jurors mouthed literally tearful apologies to defendants and defense counsel after the end of trial, it became clear that jurors had been demonstrably usurped of their authority and lawful obligations, ergo provably against their will. The appropriate word is 'arrogate.' This case is one for the books, indeed.

See the numbers yourself Strictly Politics Judge? Start Page

Incredible list of alleged victims Tiny sampling of Managing Directors

Cross Benjamin Cross Springer Direct Quote Dirty Jury?

Million-dollar con man testifying to stay out of prison

America's Best & Brightest Main Page Con THESE People?!!

More comment Censored    Masters and Millionaires
Censored        Back to Top of Page

Meanwhile, you can feed people NOW with a free click

Keep our heroes alive by LIVING, DOING more!    Remember 911day.
Keep our heroes alive by LIVING, DOING more!    Remember 911day.

Keep our heroes alive by LIVING, DOING more!    Remember 911day.
Keep our heroes alive by LIVING, DOING more!    Remember 911day.

With pre-trial hearings rushed through December, the trial began in January and did not conclude until the final week in March.
Still, not a word from the media on what was alleged to be the largest scam in American history,
wherein seventy thousand of the brightest, most accomplished humans allegedly "fell victim" to telemarketing scammers,
and loved their memberships so much that forty thousands of them renewed and/or upgraded their memberships
AT LEAST ONE OR TWO TIMES EACH OVER THE NEXT SEVEN YEARS!

Obviously, they got value, or they would not have returned in such stunning and historically unprecedented numbers.
Call the White House today. Please, demand pardons for the Book of Succeeding Well "Who's Who-ers."

Convicted of conspiring over eight years with defendants you never met, heard of, or even knew of at all?

You could not even claim that half of the evidence or trial or proceedings in total had any connection with the sales defendants.
Not even twenty percent or ten percent was remotely connected to the actions or words or knowledge or motivations of the salepeople
No, not even one percent. Make sure you understand this: NOT EVEN ONE PERCENT of the trial related to them.
No trial in American history has been found to duplicate this feat of diseased jurisprudence. Not even one solid percent,
with thousands and thousands and thousands of pages never mentioning these salespeople individually.

That was no misprint. Not even one page in a hundred, of evidence, of claims, of testimony, of the transcript itself,
not even one page in a hundred related to the actions, intentions, motivations, or words of the six sales defendants.
Tainted jury to the sleeping judge who'd already reviewed this case for two years and dismissed the charges!!
The same judge, Arthur Spatt, found that no crime had taken place, dismissing the charges,
only to have the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals reinstate the charges and, get this...
REFUSING TO HEAR AN APPEAL, despite there being more than a dozen grievous errors.
You're asked to call for an Executive Pardon. Please, raise your voices.